BOOKS<\/b><\/p>\n
The Free Inquiry Papers.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>(R. Maranto, C. Salmon, L. Jussim & S. Satel, editors).\u00a0 In press.\u00a0 American Enterprise Institute Press.<\/p>\n The Poisoning of the American Mind.<\/em> <\/strong><\/a>(L. Eppard, J. Mackey & L Jussim, editors).\u00a0 2024. George Mason University Press.<\/p>\n Research Integrity: Best Practices for the Social and Behavioral<\/em><\/strong> Sciences. (L. Jussim, J. A. Krosnick & S. T. Stevens, editors).\u00a0 Published by Oxford University Press.\u00a0 Go here for table of contents.<\/a><\/p>\n The Politics of Social Psychology<\/i><\/b> (J. T. Crawford and L. Jussim, editors). \u00a02018. Published by Routledge\/Taylor&Francis.<\/p>\n Go here for front matter, including table of contents.<\/a><\/p>\n Social Belief and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.\u00a0<\/i><\/b> 2012. Published by Oxford University Press.<\/span><\/p>\n Go: Here<\/a> for the table of contents, and the proofs of the introductory chapter.<\/p>\n Precis of the book, commentaries, and my reply to commentaries:<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n Jussim, L. (2017). \u00a0Precis of Social Perception and Social Reality.<\/i><\/a> \u00a0Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1-65, doi: 10.1017\/S0140525X1500062X, e1<\/p>\n SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY MEETS OSINT\u00a0<\/strong>(OSINT stands for Open Source Intelligence).\u00a0 OSINT is the process of collecting and analyzing publicly available information to produce actionable intelligence. In 2020, I started working with the Network Contagion Research Institute<\/a> (NCRI), which does this sort of thing, in 2020. It is a ridiculously synergistic marriage of OSINT with conventional social psychological ideas and methods.\u00a0 Although NCRI issues its own reports<\/a> (many of which I have co-authored), we have also published a series of academic papers, with more to come.\u00a0 Those are listed here. Danit Finkelstein and Sonia Yanovsky are currently (4\/15\/25) graduate students in my Rutgers lab.<\/p>\n Finkelstein, D., Yanovsky, S., Dulberg, Z., Fihrer, G. Finkelstein, J. & Jussim, L. (In press). Disrupted trust: The digital erosion of civic norms.<\/a> To appear in\u00a0The psychology of trust<\/em> (J. Forgas, editor). New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n Finkelstein, D., Yanovsky, S., Zucker, J., Jagdeep, A., Vasko, C., Jagdeep, A., Jussim, L. & Finkelstein, J. (2025). Information manipulation on TikTok and its relation to American users’ beliefs about China.<\/a> Frontiers in Social Psychology<\/i>,\u00a02<\/i>, 1497434.<\/p>\n Bass, M., Ross, A. R., Wolfson, B., Finkelstein, J., Yanovsky, S., Finkelstein, D., … & Jussim, L. (2024). Foreign funding of US higher education relates to sanctioning of scholars and antisemitism.<\/a>\u00a0Frontiers in Social Psychology<\/i>,\u00a02<\/i>, 1408913.<\/p>\n SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY, INCLUDING POLITICAL DISCRIMINATION IN ACADEMIA AND HOW POLITICS DISTORTS SCIENCE<\/b> AND\u00a0<\/b>PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE<\/b><\/p>\n Jussim, L., Honeycutt, N., Finkelstein, D., Yanovsky, S. & Finkelstein, J. (2025).\u00a0Academic misinformation<\/a>.\u00a0 In The Psychology of False Beliefs<\/em>, (J. Forgas, editor), The Visegrad International Symposium on Social Psychology\u00a0 (pp. 171-187).\u00a0 New York: Taylor and Francis.<\/p>\n Ceci, S. J., Clark, C. J., Jussim, L., & Williams, W. M. (2024). Adversarial collaboration: An undervalued approach in behavioral science<\/a>.\u00a0American Psychologist<\/i>.<\/p>\n Jussim, L. (2024). Diversity is diverse: Social justice reparations and science<\/a>.\u00a0 Perspectives on Psychological Science<\/em>.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Honeycutt, N., Careem, A., Bork, N., Finkelstein, D., Yanovsky, S. & Finkelstein, J. (2024). The New Book Burners: Academic Tribalism<\/a>\u00a0(pp. 227-246). The Tribal Mind and the Psychology of Collectivism<\/em>, J. Forgas, Ed. New York: Taylor and Francis.\u00a0Note: This is an edited proof.<\/em><\/p>\n Jussim, L., Honeycutt, N., Paresky. P., Careem, A., Finkelstein, D. & Finkelstein, J. (2023). The radicalization of the American academy<\/a> (pp. 343-366). In, Z\u00faquete, J.P. (ed). The Palgrave Handbook of Left-Wing Extremism, Volume 2. <\/em>New York: Palgrave MacMillan.<\/p>\n Clark, C., Jussim, L., \u2026 von Hippel, W. (2023). Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda<\/a>. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120<\/em> (48), e2301642120.<\/p>\n Abbott, D.,\u2026Jussim, L.,\u2026 West, J.D.1<\/sup> (2023). In defense of merit in science<\/a>.\u00a0 Journal of Controversial Ideas, 3(1), 1, doi:10.35995\/jci03010001.. 1<\/sup><\/em>paper has 29 authors, listed alphabetically.<\/p>\n Covered in the Wall Street Journal, The \u201cHurtful\u201d Idea of Scientific Merit<\/a>.\u00a0 and the New York Times, A Paper that Says Science Should be Impartial was Rejected by Major Journals. You Can\u2019t Make This Up<\/a>.<\/p>\n Honeycutt, N. & Jussim, L. (2023).\u00a0 Political bias in the social sciences: A critical, theoretical, and empirical review<\/a>.\u00a0 Political bias in the social sciences: A critical, theoretical, and empirical review (pp. 97-146). In Frisby, C.L., Redding, R.E., O’Donohue, W.T., & Lilienfeld, S.O. (Eds.), Ideological and political bias in psychology: Nature, scope and solutions<\/em>.\u00a0New York: Springer.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., & Honeycutt, N. (2023). Psychology as science and as propaganda<\/a>.\u00a0Psychology Learning & Teaching<\/em>, 14757257231195347.<\/p>\n Corneille, O., \u2026, Jussim, L.,\u2026, Lotter, L.D. (2023). Beware \u201cpersuasive communication devices\u201d when writing and reading scientific articles<\/a>. eLife<\/em>\u00a012:e88654.. <\/em>(14 authors, I am 7th<\/sup>).<\/p>\n Fox, N., Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. (2022).\u00a0 Better understanding the population size and stigmatization of psychologists using questionable research practices<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0Meta-Psychology, 6.<\/em><\/p>\n Clark, C. J., Honeycutt, N. & Jussim, L. (2022). Replicability and the psychology of science.<\/a> In S. Lilienfeld, A. Masuda, & W. O\u2019Donohue (Eds.),\u00a0Questionable Research Practices in Psychology<\/em>. New York: Springer.<\/p>\n Honeycutt N. & Jussim, L. (2021). On the Connection Between Bias and Censorship in Academia.<\/a> (note: this paper makes some unique points I have never seen elsewhere, but it is for an edited book that seems to have gotten stalled, so I have no idea if\/when it will be published — LJ<\/em>).<\/p>\n Stevens, Jussim, Honeycutt. 2020. Scholarship Suppression: Theoretical Perspectives and Emerging Trends<\/a>.<\/a> Societies.<\/em><\/p>\n Peters, Honeycutt, De Block, & Jussim, L. (2020).\u00a0 Ideological homogeneity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy. <\/a>\u00a0Philosophical Psychology, DOI: 10.1080\/09515089.2020.1743257<\/em><\/p>\n Honeycutt & Jussim (2020.\u00a0 A model of political bias in social science research<\/a>.\u00a0Psychological Inquiry, 31, 73-85.<\/em><\/p>\n Jussim, Krosnick, Stevens, & Anglin (2019). A social psychological model of scientific practices: Explaining research practices and outlining the potential for successful reforms<\/a>. Psychologica Belgica, 59, <\/em>353-372. DOI:\u00a0http:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/pb.496<\/a><\/p>\n Jussim, Stevens, Honeycutt, Anglin, & Fox (2019).\u00a0 Scientific Gullibility<\/a>.\u00a0 In J. Forgas and R. Baumeister,\u00a0The social psychology of gullibility\u00a0<\/em>(pp. 289-303).\u00a0 New York: Routledge.\u00a0 (note: this is a proof, with a small number of notes and corrections).<\/p>\n Anglin & Jussim (2017). \u00a0Science and politics: Do people support the conduct and dissemination of politicized research?<\/a> \u00a0Journal of Social and Political Psychology, Vol. 5(1)<\/i>, 142\u2013172, doi:10.5964\/jspp.v5i1.427.<\/p>\n Jussim, Crawford, Anglin, Stevens & Duarte. (2016). \u00a0Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology<\/a>. \u00a0Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.<\/i><\/p>\n Jussim, Crawford, Stevens, & Anglin (2016). \u00a0The politics of social psychological science: Distortions in the social psychology of intergroup relations. <\/a>\u00a0In P. Valdesolo and J. Graham (eds), Claremont Symposium on Social Psychology and Politics.<\/p>\n Jussim, Crawford, Stevens, Anglin, & Duarte (2016).Do high moral purposes undermine scientific integrity?<\/a><\/span> In J. Forgas, P. van Lange, & L. Jussim (eds), The Sydney Symposium on the Social Psychology of Morality. NY: Taylor & Francis.<\/span><\/p>\n Duarte, Crawford, Stern, Haidt, Jussim, & Tetlock (2015). \u00a0Political diversity will improve social psychological science<\/a>. \u00a0Behavioral and Brain Sciences. (includes target article, commentaries, and our reply).<\/p>\n Crawford, Duarte, Haidt, Jussim, Stern, & Tetlock (2015). It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science. \u00a0Behavioral and Brain Sciences. (Link above, to Duarte et al, also includes this paper).<\/p>\n Jussim, Crawford, Anglin, & Stevens (2015). \u00a0Ideological bias in social psychological research.<\/a> \u00a0In J. Forgas, K. Fiedler, & W. Crano (eds), Sydney Symposium on Social Psychology and Politics.\u00a0 NY: Taylor & Francis.<\/span><\/p>\n Jussim, Krosnick, Vazire, Stevens, & Anglin (2015). \u00a0Toward robust scientific research methods in the United States<\/a>. \u00a0An overview invited by John Holdren, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology policy.<\/p>\n Jussim, L. (2012). \u00a0Liberal privilege in academic psychology<\/a>, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7<\/i>, 504-507.<\/p>\n REVIEWS ON INTERGROUP RELATIONS (implicit bias, microaggressions, stereotype threat, DEI)<\/strong><\/p>\n Jussim, L. (2025). The discrimination paradox.<\/a> Under review.<\/p>\n Mogiliski, J., Jussim, L., Wilson, A. & Love, B.\u00a0 (2025). Defining DEI by the scientific (de)merits of its programming<\/a>.\u00a0Theory and Society, <\/em>1-14.<\/p>\n Rubinstein, R. S. & Jussim, L. (2025). How and when do individuating information and social category information influence implicit judgments of individual members of known social groups? A review<\/a>.\u00a0Societies, 15,\u00a0<\/em>136.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Yanovsky, S., Careem, A., Honeycutt, N. & Finkelstein, D. (2025).\u00a0 Limitations, contestations, failures, and falsification of dramatic claims in intergroup relations. <\/a>\u00a0In T. Nelson (Editor), Handbook of Stereotyping, Prejudice and Discrimination (<\/em>4th edtion, pp. 17-55). New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Careem, A., Goldberg, Z., Honeycutt, N. & Stevens. S. (2025). \u00a0IAT scores, racial gaps, and scientific gaps.\u00a0 In Krosnick, J.A., Stark, T. H & Scott, A.L. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism <\/em>(pp. 374-411).\u00a0 <\/em>New York: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n Cantu, E. & Jussim, L (2022).\u00a0 Microaggressions, questionable science, and free speech<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0Texas Review of Law and Politics, 26 (2021): 217-264.<\/em><\/p>\n Jussim, L., Careem, A., Honeycutt, N., Stevens, S. T. (2020).\u00a0 Do IAT scores explain racial inequality?<\/a> In J. Forgas, W. D. Crano & K. Fiedler (Eds),\u00a0Applications of social psychology: How social psychology can contribute to the solution of real-world problems.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>The Sydney Symposium on Social Psychology: Applied Social Psychology. New York: Routledge. (Note, this is the manuscript version; for now, the final version is only available in the book).<\/p>\n EMPIRICAL IAT PAPERS<\/strong><\/p>\n Rubinstein, R. S., Marshall, M., Jussim, L., & Honeycutt, N. (2023). Effects of individuating information on implicit person perception are largely consistent across individual differences and two types of target groups. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences<\/em>,\u00a04<\/em>, 100090.<\/p>\n Rubinstein, R. S., Jussim, L., Loh, B. & Buraus, M. (2022). A theory of reliance on individuating information and stereotypes in implicit judgments of individuals and social groups.\u00a0 Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2022\/5118325<\/p>\n Rubinstein, R. S., Jussim, L., Bock, J. E. & Loh, B. (2021).\u00a0<\/em>Unobservable stereotypes are more malleable than observable stereotypes in implicit person perception<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology.\u00a0<\/em>(Manuscript version).<\/p>\n Rubinstein, R. S., & Jussim, L. (2019). Stimulus pairing and statement target information have equal effects on stereotype\u2010relevant evaluations of individuals.\u00a0Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology<\/i>,\u00a03<\/i>(4), 231-249.<\/p>\n Rubinstein, R., Jussim, L., & Stevens, S. T. (2018).\u00a0\u00a0Reliance on individuating information and stereotypes in implicit and explicit pe<\/a>rson perception<\/a>. \u00a0Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75,<\/i>\u00a054-70.<\/p>\n STEREOTYPE ACCURACY<\/b><\/p>\n Jussim, L., Stevens, S. T., & Honeycutt, N. (2019).\u00a0 The accuracy of stereotypes about personality<\/a> (pp. 245-257). The Handbook of Accurate Personality Judgment\u00a0<\/em>(T. Letzring & J. Spain, editors), New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Stevens, S. T., & Honeycutt, N. (2019).\u00a0 The accuracy of demographic stereotypes.<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0Journal of South China Normal University,\u00a0<\/em>May 2019, 5-18 [in Chinese<\/strong>]. (Click here for the English version<\/a>).<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Stevens, S. T. & Honeycutt, N. \u00a0(2018). Unasked questions about stereotype accuracy. <\/a>\u00a0Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6, <\/i>214-229.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., Anglin, S. M., Chambers, J., Stevens, S. T., & Cohen, F. \u00a0(2016). \u00a0Stereotype accuracy: One of the largest relationships and most replicable effects in all of social psychology<\/a>. \u00a0In T. Nelson (ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination <\/i>(2nd ed), pp. 31-63. \u00a0Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., & Rubinstein, R. S. (2015). \u00a0Stereotype (in)accuracy in perceptions of groups and individuals.<\/a> \u00a0Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 490-497.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Cain, T., Crawford, J., Harber, K., & Cohen, F. \u00a0(2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes<\/a>. Pp. 199-227 in T. Nelson (ed.), \u00a0Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).<\/p>\n Jussim, L., McCauley, C. R., & Lee, Y. T. \u00a0(1995). Why study stereotype accuracy and inaccuracy?<\/a> \u00a0In Lee, Y.T., Jussim, L., McCauley, C. R. (eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 3-28). \u00a0Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.<\/p>\n Lee, Y. T., Jussim, L., & McCauley, C. R. \u00a0(Eds.). \u00a0Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences<\/a>. \u00a0Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.<\/p>\n My book (link at top of page), and the two Behavioral and Brain Sciences articles (links next section) also address stereotype accuracy.<\/p>\n STEREOTYPES, PREJUDICE, EXPECTANCIES, BIAS, SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECIES, ACCURACY, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM<\/b><\/p>\n See links to Social Perception and Social Reality, and BBS Precis, at top of page.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n Honeycutt, N., Careem, A., Lewis, Jr., N. A. & Jussim, L. (In press).\u00a0 Are STEM faculty biased against female applicants?<\/a> A robust replication and extension of Moss-Racusin and Colleagues (2012).\u00a0\u00a0Meta-Psychology.\u00a0 <\/em>Supplement available here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n Madon, S., Jussim, L., Guyll, M., Nofziger, H., Salib, E., Willard, J., & Scherr, K. C. (2018). The accumulation of stereotype-based self-fulfilling prophecies<\/a>. \u00a0Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115,\u00a0<\/i>825-844.<\/p>\n Cohen, F., Jussim, L., Harber, K., & Bhasin, G. (2009). Modern anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli Attitudes. <\/a>\u00a0Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 290-306. (The version available here also includes supplemental material rejected \u00a0by JPSP — modern political cartoons from mainstream media in the Mideast, Europe, and the U.S. depicting Israel and Israeli leaders in a vicious and revolting manner reminiscent of Nazi-era propaganda.)<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Robustelli, S. & Cain, T. (2009). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies.<\/a> \u00a0Pp. 349-380 in Handbook of Motivation at School, A. Wigfield and K. Wentzel (eds). \u00a0Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.<\/p>\n Jussim, L. (2005). Accuracy: Criticisms, controversies, criteria, components, and cognitive processes. <\/a>\u00a0Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 1-93.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., Crawford, J. T., Cain, T. R., Cohen, F. (2005). Social reality makes the social mind<\/a>: Self-fulfilling prophecy, stereotypes, bias, and accuracy. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 6, 85-102.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies.<\/a> \u00a0Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131-155.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. J.(1996). \u00a0Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. \u00a0Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 281-388.\u00a0 \u00a0Part I<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Part II<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Part III. <\/a><\/p>\n Madon, S. J., \u00a0Jussim, L., Keiper, S., Eccles, J., Smith, A., & Palumbo, P. (1998). \u00a0The accuracy and power of sex, social class and ethnic stereotypes: Naturalistic studies in person perception.<\/a> \u00a0Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, \u00a024, 1304-1318. Teachers judge students almost entirely based on their achievement. \u00a0Stereotype biases are few and far between (though not quite zero).<\/p>\n Jussim, L. (1991). \u00a0Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model.<\/a> \u00a0Psychological Review, 98, 54-73.<\/p>\n Jussim, L., Coleman, L., & Lerch, L.(1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories.<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.<\/p>\n MISCELLANEOUS OTHER STUFF<\/b><\/p>\n A short preliminary report on how to dramatically reduce grandmother death resulting from exams<\/a><\/p>\n A short statement about intellectual imperialism within social psychology.<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Essays, Blogs, Editorials<\/b><\/p>\n New blog site: https:\/\/unsafescience.substack.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n Old blog site: https:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/blog\/rabble-rouser<\/a><\/p>\n Haidt, J., & Jussim, L. (February, 2016). \u00a0Psychological science and viewpoint diversity<\/a>. \u00a0\u00a0Presidential Column of <\/b>The APS Observer<\/i><\/b>,<\/i> Association for Psychology Science<\/p>\n Haidt, J., & Jussim, L. (May 6, 2016). Hard truths about race on campus. <\/a>\u00a0The Wall Street Journal.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n Jussim, L. (August, 2016). \u00a0Truth in stereotype<\/a>s. \u00a0Aeon.<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"