Homepage
Time & Location*: |
Thursdays from 11am – 12pm in Hill 705 |
|
| (*Some talks may be scheduled for different times or locations. Such details will be provided additionally.) | ||
Organizers: |
Narek Hovsepyannh507@math.rutgers.edu |
||
| (For inquiries, e.g. to be added to the mailing list, please contact either one of the organizers.) | |||
19 February |
|
Vishv Jeet, PGIM“A Crucial Enhancement to the Takahashi and Alexander’s Cash Flow Model” |
AbstractThe Takahashi and Alexander (TA) model is a widely used framework for simulating private equity cash flows. However, its core shape parameter b, which governs the distribution timing, lacks a direct connection to investor-relevant metrics such as internal rate of return (IRR) and total value to paid-in capital (TVPI). This article introduces a reformulation of the TA model that replaces the opaque b-parameter with a more intuitive and analytically derived function of the investor’s performance goals. We define a dimensionless quantity d=log(M)/(G*L) where M is the desired TVPI, G the target IRR, and L, the fund’s life. We then derive the relationship b=exp(pi*d)/sqrt(2) offering a closed-form link between fund performance objectives and the TA model’s cash flow shape. This formulation simplifies calibration, enhances interpretability, and enables goal-driven simulation of capital calls and distributions. Numerical validation confirms the robustness of the approximation across a wide range of practical scenarios, making the TA model significantly more accessible and aligned with real-world decision-making. |
2 April |
|
Joshua Finkelstein, Los Alamos National Laboratory“Accelerating Electronic Structure and Quantum Chemistry Simulations with AI-Hardware.“ |
AbstractModern high-performance computing is being reshaped by novel hardware architectures, particularly those developed for AI, offering unprecedented performance. Effectively using these systems for scientific workloads, however, often requires redesigning the underlying physics, algorithms, and data structures, as well as adapting existing methods to better align with these architectures. In this talk, we present our efforts to apply emerging AI hardware to non-AI workloads, specifically quantum chemistry and electronic structure calculations, and showcase our significant performance gains. |
30 April |
|
Azita Mayeli, City University of New York“Wave packet methods for quantitative spectral estimates in space-frequency localization.“ |
AbstractIn this talk, I will discuss eigenvalue estimates for operators related to simultaneous localization in space and frequency. This problem is connected to phase-space localization, the uncertainty principle, and spectral concentration. It also appears naturally in harmonic analysis, signal representation, approximation theory, and mathematical physics.
The main objects are space-frequency limiting operators. Their eigenvalues measure how well a bandlimited function can be concentrated on a given spatial region. Usually, most eigenvalues are close to either 0 or 1, and only a smaller number are in the middle transition region, which is often called the plunge region. Estimating this region gives quantitative information about the effective number of degrees of freedom. This is similar in spirit to counting states in phase space.
The method is based on a wave packet decomposition adapted to the geometry of the spatial and frequency domains. These wave packets are constructed using smooth Gevrey cutoffs. This gives strong Fourier localization and also useful spatial control. The wave packets behave like approximate eigenfunctions for the localization operator.
As a result, we obtain explicit bounds on the number of eigenvalues in (ε,1−ε). I will explain how phase-space localization and geometric decomposition can lead to quantitative spectral estimates in higher-dimensional settings.
|